The sandsifter audits x86 processors for hidden instructions and hardware bugs, by systematically generating machine code to search through a processor's instruction set, and monitoring execution for anomalies. Sandsifter has uncovered secret processor instructions from every major vendor; ubiquitous software bugs in disassemblers, assemblers, and emulators; flaws in enterprise hypervisors; and both benign and security-critical hardware bugs in x86 chips.
With the multitude of x86 processors in existence, the goal of the tool is to enable users to check their own systems for hidden instructions and bugs.
To run a basic audit against your processor:
sudo ./sifter.py --unk --dis --len --sync --tick -- -P1 -t
The computer is systematically scanned for anomalous instructions. In the upper half, you can view the instructions that the sandsifter is currently testing on the processor. In the bottom half, the sandsifter reports anomalies it finds.
The search will take from a few hours to a few days, depending on the speed of and complexity of your processor. When it is complete, summarize the results:
Typically, several million undocumented instructions on your processor will be found, but these generally fall into a small number of different groups. After binning the anomalies, the summarize tool attempts to assign each instruction to an issue category:
- Software bug (for example, a bug in your hypervisor or disassembler),
- Hardware bug (a bug in your CPU), or
- Undocumented instruction (an instruction that exists in the processor, but is not acknowledged by the manufacturer)
The results of a scan can sometimes be difficult for the tools to automatically classify, and may require manual analysis. For help analyzing your results, feel free to send the ./data/log file to [email protected]. No personal information, other than the processor make, model, and revision (from /proc/cpuinfo) are included in this log.
Scanning with the sandsifter has uncovered undocumented processor features across dozens of opcode categories, flaws in enterprise hypervisors, bugs in nearly every major disassembly and emulation tool, and critical hardware bugs opening security vulnerabilities in the processor itself.
Details of the results can be found in the project whitepaper.
(TODO: detailed results enumeration here)
Sandsifter requires first installing the Capstone disassembler: http://www.capstone-engine.org/. Capstone can typically be installed with:
sudo apt-get install libcapstone3 libcapstone-devSandsifter can be built with:
sudo pip install capstone
makeand is then run with
sudo ./sifter.py --unk --dis --len --sync --tick -- -P1 -t
Flags are passed to the sifter with --flag, and to the injector with -- -f.
sudo ./sifter.py --unk --dis --len --sync --tick -- -P1 -tSifter flags:
search for length differences in all instructions (instructions that
executed differently than the disassembler expected, or did not
exist when the disassembler expected them to
search for length differences in valid instructions (instructions that
executed differently than the disassembler expected)
search for unknown instructions (instructions that the disassembler doesn't
know about but successfully execute)
the inverse of --unk, search for invalid disassemblies (instructions that do
not successfully execute but that the disassembler acknowledges)
periodically write the current instruction to disk
save search progress on exit
resume search from last saved state
write search results to disk as they are found
do not store results in memory
mode: brute force
mode: randomized fuzzing
mode: tunneled fuzzing
mode: externally directed fuzzing
raw output mode
text output mode
write periodic progress to stderr
allow null dereference (requires sudo)
allow duplicate prefixes
no nx bit support
in random search, seed value
in brute search, maximum search depth
maximum number of prefixes to search
instruction at which to start search (inclusive)
instruction at which to end search (exclusive)
core on which to perform search
blacklist the specified instruction
number of simultaneous jobs to run
number of base instruction bytes in each sub range
m: Mode - change the search mode (brute force, random, or tunnel) for the sifter
q: Quit - exit the sifter
p: Pause - pause or unpause the search
The scanning supports four different search algorithms, which can be set at the command line, or cycled via hotkeys.
- Random searching generates random instructions to test; it generally produces results quickly, but is unable to find complex hidden instructions and bugs.
- Brute force searching tries instructions incrementally, up to a user-specified length; in almost all situations, it performs worse than random searching.
- Driven or mutation driven searching is designed to create new, increasingly complex instructions through genetic algorithms; while promising, this approach was never fully realized, and is left as a stub for future research.
- Tunneling is the approach described in the presentation and white paper, and in almost all cases provides the best trade-off between thoroughness and speed.
For best results, the tool should be run as the root user. This is necessary so that the process can map into memory a page at address 0, which requires root permissions. This page prevents many instructions from seg-faulting on memory accesses, which allows a more accurate fault analysis.
The primary limitation for the depth of an instruction search is the number of prefix bytes to explore, with each additional prefix byte increasing the search space by around a factor of 10. Limit prefix bytes with the -P flag.
The interface for the sifter is designed for a 256 color terminal. While the details vary greatly depending on your terminal, this can roughly be accomplished with:
The interface assumes the terminal is of at least a certain size; if the interface is not rendering properly, try increasing the terminal size; this can often be accomplished by decreasing the terminal font size.
In some cases, it may be desirable or necessary to run the tool without the graphical front end. This can be done by running the injector directly:
sudo ./injector -P1 -t -0To filter the results of a direct injector invocation, grep can be used. For example,
sudo ./injector -P1 -r -0 | grep '\.r' | grep -v sigillsearches for instructions for which the processor and disassembler disagreed on the instruction length (grep '.r'), but the instruction successfully executed (grep -v sigill).
- Targeted fuzzing
In many cases, it is valuable to direct the fuzzer to a specific target. For example, if you suspect that an emulator has flaws around repeated 'lock' prefixes (0xf0), you could direct the fuzzer to search this region of the instruction space with the -i and -e flags:
sudo ./sifter.py --unk --dis --len --sync --tick -- -t -i f0f0 -e f0f1 -D -P15
- Legacy systems
For scanning much older systems (i586 class processors, low memory systems), pass the --low-mem flag to the sifter and the -N flag to the injector:
sudo ./sifter.py --unk --dis --len --sync --tick --low-mem -- -P1 -t -NIf you observe your scans completing too quickly (for example, a scan completes in seconds), it is typically because these flags are required for the processor you are scanning.
- 32 vs. 64 bit
By default, sandsifter is built to target the bitness of the host operating system. However, some instructions have different behaviors when run in a 32 bit process compared to when run in a 64 bit process. To explore these scenarios, it is sometimes valuable to run a 32 bit sandsifter on a 64 bit system.
To build a 32 bit sandsifter on a 64 bit system, Capstone must be installed as 32 bit; the instructions for this can be found at http://www.capstone-engine.org/.
Then sandsifter must be built for a 32 bit architecture:
make CFLAGS=-m32With this, the 32 bit instruction space can be explored on a 64 bit system.
- A discussion of the techniques and results can be found in the Black Hat presentation.
- Technical details are described in the whitepaper.
- Slides from the Black Hat presentation are here.
sandsifter is a research effort from Christopher Domas (@xoreaxeaxeax).