DNS lookup and SSH session forwarded across an UART connection to a Pi
PSC allows to e2e encrypt shell sessions, single- or multip-hop, being agnostic of the underlying transport, as long as it is reliable and can send/receive Base64 encoded data without modding/filtering. Along with the e2e pty that you receive (for example inside a portshell), you can forward TCP and UDP connections, similar to OpenSSH's
-L parameter. This works transparently and without the need of an IP address assigned locally at the starting point. This allows forensicans and pentesters to create network connections for example via:
- UART sessions to a device
adb shellsessions, if the OEM
adbddoesn't support TCP forwarding
- telnet sessions
- modem dialups without ppp
- other kinds of console logins
- mixed SSH/telnet/modem sessions
Just imagine you would have an invisible ppp session inside your shell session, without the remote peer actually supporting ppp.
It runs on Linux, Android, OSX, FreeBSD, NetBSD and (possibly) OpenBSD.
PSC also includes SOCKS4 and SOCKS5 proxy support in order to have actual web browsing sessions via portshells or modem dialups remotely.
Makefile to reflect your pre shared keys, as defined at the top of the
Then just type
make on Linux.
On BSD, you need to install GNU make and invoke
On OSX, you need to install OpenSSL and declare the apropriate installation path inside the
Makefile and type
On Linux, PSC will use Unix98 pseudo terminals, on other systems it will use POSIX pty's but that should be transparent to you. I once added 4.4BSD pty and SunOS support back in the stone age for a particular reason, so it may or may not build even with Solaris.
Plain and simple. On your local box, execute
pscl, and pass any TCP or UDP ports you want to forward from the remote site to a particular address. For example:
linux:~ > ./pscl -T 1234:[192.168.0.254]:22 -U 1234:[188.8.131.52]:53PortShellCrypter [pscl] v0.60 (C) 2006-2020 stealth -- github.com/stealth/pscpscl: set up local TCP port 1234 to proxy to 192.168.0.254:22 @ remote.pscl: set up local UDP port 1234 to proxy to 184.108.40.206:53 @ remote.pscl: Waiting for [pscr] session to appear ...linux:~ >[ UART / SSH / ... login to remote side ... ]
On the remote site (the last hop) with the shell session, no matter if its in a portshell, SSH, console login etc, you execute
linux:~ > ./pscrPortShellCrypter [pscr] v0.60 (C) 2006-2020 stealth -- github.com/stealth/pscpscl: Seen STARTTLS sequence, enabling crypto.linux:~ >
Once you execute
pscr, both ends establish a crypto handshake and lay an additional protocol over your existing session that is transparent for you. You can then connect to
127.0.0.1:1234 on your local box to reach
192.168.0.254:22 via TCP or the
220.127.116.11 resolver via UDP. This also works with [IPv6] addresses, if the remote site has IPv6 connectivity. Actually, you can even use it to translate IPv4 software to IPv6, since you always connect to
127.0.0.1 on the local side.
You can pass multiple
-U parameters. If you lost track if your session is already e2e encrypted, you can send a
SIGUSR1 to the local
pscl process, and it will tell you.
PSC is also useful if you want to use tor from a remote SSH shell, where you can forward the socks5 and the DNS port to the remote hosts
127.0.0.1 address. Since SSH does not forward UDP packets, you would normally use two
socat connectors or similar to resolve via the tor node. PSC has the advantage of keeping the UDP datagram boundaries, while
SSH -L may break datagram boundaries and create malformed DNS requests.
The session will be encrypted with
aes_256_ctr of a PSK that you choose in the
Makefile. This crypto scheme is mallable, but adding AAD or OAD data blows up the packet size, where every byte counts since on interactive sessions and due to Base64 encoding, each typed character already causes much more data to be sent.
UART sessions may be used via
screen but for example not via
minicom since minicom will create invisible windows with status lines and acts like a filter that destroys PSC's protocol. PSC tries to detect filtering and can live with certain amout of data mangling, but in some situations it is not possible to recover. Similar thing with
tmux. You should avoid stacking pty handlers with PSC that mess/handle their incoming data too much.
SOCKS4 and SOCKS5 support
pscl also supports forwarding of TCP connections via SOCKS4 (
-4 port) and SOCKS5 (
-5 port). This sets up port as SOCKS port for TCP connections, so for instance you can browse remote networks from a portshell session without the need to open any other connection during a pentest. For chrome, SOCKS4 must be used, as the PSC SOCKS implementation does not support resolving domain names on their own. Instead, it requires IPv4 or IPv6 addresses to be passed along. Since chrome will set the SOCKS5 protocol address type always to domain name (
0x03) - even if an IP address is entered in the address bar - SOCKS5 is not usuable with chrome. But you can use chrome with SOCKS4, since this protocol only supports IPv4 addresses, not domain names.